Rylands v Fletcher, Facts, Decision, Requirements, Defences
What is Rylands v Fletcher This case is concerned with nuisance in tort law As the law of nuisance has occasionally been applied to isolated events causing damage to neighbour’s property. It was argued earlier that in such cases liability is more properly to be founded on the law of negligence rather than nuisance. However an exception must be made for these cases falling within the ambit of the rule in rylands v fletcher. Where there has been an escape of a dangerous thing in the course of a non-natural use of land, the occupier is liable for damage to another as a result of the escape. This is so irrespective of whether the occupier has been at fault (i.e it is a tort of strict liability). However liability is not absolute, there are defences, and the defendant is only liable for the foreseeable consequences of the escape. Facts of rylands v fletcher The defendant hired some independent contractors to build a dam on the land they occupied. Unknown to the i